No single speech during the 20th Century shaped the lives of 21st Century Americans as did the I Have a Dream speech on August 28, 1963. It is great to be able to share it with you -- both the video of the speech and the text below. In our Presentation Skills Training session, we often examine aspects of this speech and extract lessons for all more
DPK Public Relations founder Dan Keeney, APR, posted a good discussion about the current state of news embargoes to his blog, The PR Counselor Is In and we wanted to share the link with you and offer a brief synopsis. The title is "New Rules to Guide Use of News Embargoes."
He recounts his years as a journalist in the 1980s and early 1990s, saying he regularly honored embargoes.
"We knew that if we didn't comply, we would have a moment of glory as we broke the news, but forever after the rest of the media that did comply would continue to get the information early and we would not. We would have to play catch up for the rest of eternity."
It was a risk that journalists simply could not take. Of course those were different times. News was gathered in person or over the phone. There was no Internet. Newspapers still had just one deadline each day and TV stations still had four deadlines each day. The only around the clock news organization was CNN and until the first Gulf War, they were struggling to find a niche and barely surviving.
So the media complied with embargoes. Those that didn't could not compete. They were black listed.
Keeney also points to PR counselor Kellye Crane who writes on her Solo PR Pro blog that the days of actually providing context are probably behind us. In her post, "Modern PR Pros and the Breaking News Dilemma," Kellye writes that anyone who releases information under embargo should anticipate that the embargo will be violated.
Keeney says he understand that times have changed:
"I understand the arguments of those who suggest that embargoes are meant to be broken. Why in the world would you expect a journalist to keep a secret? It doesn't make sense. Their job is to report news, not keep it secret until the appointed time. So I get that. But the end of embargoes can diminish the public's understanding of complex and sometimes conflicting data. If the intent of communication is to create a mutual understanding and not simply inform, then embargoes can play a positive role in encouraging that mutual understanding."
But before completely discontinuing the use of embargoes, Keeney endorses the recommendations made by Kellye -- guidelines for the use of embargoes in this new age:
1. Question whether the news is worthy of an embargo.
2. Reach out to your key relationships in advance and ask if they honor embargoes (and do not include information about the nature of the announcement). Only those who respond in the affirmative should receive your information in advance.
3. When using embargoes, never offer an exclusive to a subset of outlets.
4. If someone violates the embargo and breaks the story, have your “Plan B” in place just in case.
DPK Public Relations founder Dan Keeney, APR, posted a good discussion about the current state of news embargoes to his blog, 
•
del.icio.us
digg
facebook